Organisations are investing millions in artificial intelligence. Yet most projects don’t deliver. Around 80 percent fail. They begin with big promises: faster processes, smarter decisions at lower cost. But they often end in frustration. Systems stay unused, teams lose interest and leaders lose confidence.
Why does this happen? Because AI is not just another tool. You can’t simply plug it in and expect results. It’s complex and sometimes unpredictable. Often, its decisions are hard to explain. And it does more than automate. AI changes the way a company works and reaches into the heart of organizations, affecting every part of the company, teams, processes, and culture.
The Real Challenge: Beyond Technology
In my experience working with leadership teams, a useful way to think about AI is this: it’s like hiring a new executive with no clear job description. The excitement is there and the potential seems huge. But no one really knows how to work with them. They join meetings, offer suggestions, maybe even make decisions. Still, people feel unsure. Who’s responsible for what? Can we rely on their judgement? Are they helping or complicating things?
This is what happens when AI is introduced without a clear role, without context, and without support. People pull back, coordination suffers and trust breaks down. The system might work perfectly, but if people don’t know how to use it, it stays on the shelf. Research shows the same pattern. Human-AI teams tend to show lower levels of trust compared to human-only teams. Performance drops. Communication gets harder. At the same time, many executives say they are actively looking for companies that use AI well and feel more forward-looking.
I see this every week. Leaders tell me they’ve invested in AI, yet the tools go unused. Teams feel frustrated, overwhelmed and managers grow sceptical. Promises turn into confusion. But this is not just a technology issue. It touches how people work, how they interact, and how they see their role. It affects control, identity and confidence. When AI is treated as a strategic hire, not a piece of software, the story changes. Leaders take time to define its purpose. They involve the team early and they keep the conversation going. That’s when trust builds. That’s when the system starts to help instead of getting in the way.
AIDE: A Systemic, Human-Centric Approach
This is why I developed the model AIDE, which is a systemic framework rooted in systems theory, enriched by principles of the PERMA-Lead model from positive psychology and the metatheory of change. It acknowledges that organizations are complex, adaptive systems where changes in one part can ripple through the whole. But more than structure or strategy, AI shapes how people think, feel and work together.
Team Dynamics: Navigating Emotions and Identity
I remember a team leader who whispered during a workshop, „Will AI replace me?“ Beneath any AI initiative lie human fears, hopes, and uncertainties. Fear of Job Loss: Many see AI as a threat to their roles. Loss of Control: Decisions made by AI feel opaque, reducing confidence. Identity Conflicts: Employees question if their skills still matter. In another organization, a team stopped sharing ideas because they assumed „the AI knows best.“ But trust in AI led to a breakdown in human trust.
Trust Erosion: Teams trust each other less when AI makes decisions.
Disrupted Interactions: Direct collaboration gives way to automated processes.
Responsibility Ambiguity: Who is accountable when AI makes mistakes?
AIDE acknowledges these human dynamics, offering not just technical solutions but also emotional resilience, clear roles, and psychological safety.
When Digital Playbooks Fall Short: Making AI Work in the Real World
In earlier digital transformation projects, I often worked with the KUER model, a research-backed framework I developed in 2017. It proved practical and effective across many organisations. KUER helped teams design new services, stay focused on user needs, and build digital business models. It worked well for technologies that were more transparent, structured, and easier to manage. But AI doesn’t fit that mould. It requires a different mindset, one that balances opportunity with responsibility, experimentation with structure, and technology with human impact. That’s what the AIDE model is built for, it is structured around four phases, each supported by essential principles: Transparency, Responsibility, Human-Centredness, and Continuous Learning.
AIDE Model stands for:
Alignment: Set a clear AI strategy, secure leadership commitment, and establish strong governance.
Insight: Understand your stakeholders, map value across people, business, and society, and define ethical guidelines.
Define: Build skills, set clear expectations, prototype rapidly, and empower internal champions.
Evolution: Continuously monitor, adapt, and communicate AI’s impact while fostering a culture of learning and responsibility.
With 24 clear factors, AIDE helps you move from isolated experiments to scalable, ethical AI solutions. It’s not just about adopting AI, it’s about making it work for your people, your business, and society.
Scientific Foundation of AIDE
AIDE is part of an ongoing research project, grounded in the analysis of 30 in-depth interviews with AI leaders and their practical insights and learnings from recent months (and sometimes years). We continue to test, refine, and evolve the model through real-world application. Our work spans companies of all sizes, from small businesses and corporate startups to large enterprises, across different industries and teams. This is more than hands-on experience. It is part of a structured research effort exploring how AI can be integrated responsibly and effectively.
AIDE is grounded in three foundational theories to ensure that it is not only practical but also deeply human-centered, balancing technology, psychology, and organizational dynamics:
- Systems Theory: Understanding organizations as complex, adaptive systems where changes ripple through interconnected parts.
- Metatheory of Change: Recognizing that transformation requires adaptive strategies and understanding of psychological, social, and cultural dynamics.
- PERMA-Lead Model from Positive Psychology: Emphasizing well-being, engagement, positive relationships, meaning, and accomplishment as crucial factors for sustainable AI integration.
AIDE is a learning model. It is not a rigid concept but evolves with every application, every feedback, every new experience. And is not just my project, it is a shared journey. To all leaders, innovators, and teams: Let’s shape the future of responsible AI together. I invite you to join the conversation, share your experiences, and even participate in pilot projects for human-agent teams.
Together, we can make AI a true advantage for people and organizations.
„AI should not just replace tasks. It should create value, spark creativity, and open up new possibilities. If we use it wisely, it can empower people instead of replacing them.“
THE AIDE MODEL
4 Phases and 24 success factors
Phase 1: Alignment & Readiness: Setting the Foundation
- AI Maturity & Readiness
Evaluate how prepared your organization is for AI, considering technical capabilities, cultural attitudes, and societal impact.- Executive Commitment to Responsible AI
Ensure top management is fully committed to ethical, responsible AI use with clear goals.- AI Governance Operations
Set up a framework for ethical, legal, and social responsibility in AI management, ensuring clear decision-making structures and accountable leadership involvement.- Psychological Safety & Trust
Create a safe space where employees can openly discuss AI-related concerns and ideas.- AI Competence Hub (Center of Excellence)
Establish an internal hub for AI expertise, support, and best practices.- Modern IT Infrastructure & Data Governance
Build a secure, scalable IT infrastructure with clear data governance policies.
Phase 2: Insight & Discovery: Understanding the Context
- Interdisciplinary Co-creation
Bring together diverse teams to co-create and prototype AI solutions.- Stakeholder Mapping
Identify Stakeholder groups affected by the AI solutions, both inside and outside the organization.- 360° Value Mapping
Evaluate the impact of AI across Human, Business, Organizational, and Societal Values.- Human-AI Roles & Workflows
Define clear guidelines for how humans and AI systems will interact.- Scenario Planning for AI Risks & Ethics
Anticipate, mitigate, and plan for ethical and operational risks in AI use.- AI Strategy & Governance Alignment
Establishes a clear connection between AI initiatives and long-term business objectives, while providing a strategic roadmap to guide their deployment.
Phase 3: Define & Enablement: Building Skills and Prototypes
- Impact Matrix & Success Scorecards
Continuously assess the value of AI solutions for people, businesses, organizations, and society.- Prototype & Evaluation Management
Rapidly develop, test, and refine AI solutions in a controlled setting.- AI Expectation & Goals Alignment
Set clear, realistic expectations for AI capabilities and align them with organizational goals.- AI Skills & Role Planning
Define and develop the skills and roles required for effective AI integration.- AI Literacy Trainings & Transfer
Equip employees with practical AI skills and knowledge for responsible use.- AI Ambassadors & Peer Coaching
Empower internal champions to promote AI adoption by building internal networks for best practice sharing.
Phase 4: Embedding & Evolution: Sustaining Change
- Continuous Change Communication
Keep communication around AI adaptive, transparent, and continuous.- Continuous Change Monitoring
Track, measure, and adapt AI use using multi-layer, predictive, and adaptive methods.- AI Learning Circles
Supports peer groups or networks where employees share AI knowledge and learn from each other.- AI Aligned Change & Reward Systems
Guide AI-driven transformation and ensure fair recognition for contributors.- Positive Leadership (based on PERMA)
Foster a culture of trust, encouragement, and adaptive leadership around AI.- Human-AI Mindset
Encourage continuous learning, collaboration, and critical thinking in AI use.



